My friend suggests an interesting site to easily find the funding for the regional environment.

Pienosole.it offers the opportunity through a map of Italy to find for each region of the financial opportunities it offers regarding the installation of photovoltaic and renewable energy.

The data are continually updated by the ENEA (Italian Agency for New Technologies, Energy and the Environment):
ENEA carries out research and technological innovation in energy, environment and new technologies, to support policies of competitiveness and sustainable development of the country.

The Board operates within four areas: clean energy technologies for the territory; Technologies for the future applications of advanced technologies. He is also important tasks for the country.

Quick to understand and easy to use, can stay updated on current regulations and the possibility of obtaining attractive financing.

I recommend everyone look at it, maybe even to those who are completely disinterested on the subject, you might find something interesting.

If you find something that you want to talk, tell in our comments.

Venturi (President Confesercenti) denounces the closure of more small-medium enterprises, which not being able to turn to banks for a loan, end up in the hands of usurers.

‘The crisis makes small businesses more exposed to moneylenders – he explains – In 2008 at least 15,000 have closed because ‘over-indebted and often choked. The first data of 2009 confirm this trend. “

The figure is alarming and I think a lack of information, linked to the economic crisis has led to achieve those results. If banks implement tightening credit and provide money only to those who already have, logically the single entrepreneur finds he having to ask for money elsewhere, ending sometimes in the wrong hands.

Banks to acquire new customers and prevent such phenomena, could carry out an advertising campaign that outlines some products to those affected by the crisis and that in a moment of weakness are addressed to those who should not.
Full information can encourage a relationship with the banks and improve the image the lending institution.

However, if finished in the money-lenders, reported to authorities what happened, because only they can do to end the inevitable sequence of dangers to which there exponent daily.

Published in the Official Journal of 30 March, the ministerial decree approving the new model to be used for the payment of municipal property tax, which sees eliminated the discount on additional ICI for the first home.

C on the ministerial decree of 25 March, the new model incorporates the provisions of the current account dictated by DL 93/2008. Are thus eliminated the boxes that enable the taxpayer to report the amount of the further deduction of the primary residence.

The report, which is valid from 2009, is used for both direct payments payable to the Municipality where the buildings are located, and for those affected through the “foster-service recovery.”

Taxpayers will also pay the tax using the telemetric service Italian Post Office, who will issue, in addition to confirmation of this, even the virtual image of the module (or communication in text format) with all data entered on the property. It will be up to the Italian Post Office to send to the common owner of the account printed copies of receipts or pictures of the bulletins by electronic mail, maintaining in its files copies of payments made.

The decree provides, however, can continue to make use of banking services for the purpose of making payments.

In this article from the site BankNoise defines the possibility to sustain their mortgage against default risk.
Rightly insurance should be taken before the default risk is real or even already has not paid one installment.
But the author of the article presents the problem of demand and fairness in helping those with adjustable-rate mortgages have been supported by the state for nonpayment of installment.

Is it fair to help those who are not insured or has made a loan at a fixed rate on his own (but they paid less), while others have had to pay a higher price to get the same guarantees?

In my opinion the answer is both sides.
It is wrong because economically speaking in the lending market certainly creates such an imbalance is not indifferent between customers who have made different choices when purchasing and could push more people not to worry too much about the insolvency of payments.

It is right ethically speaking, because you cannot leave thousands if not millions of people without a home, on the brink of bankruptcy. The protection of the population by a state must always be present. Who, wishing to go into that well, we can easily understand how the economic consequences of an operation by lax state goalkeeper tragic repercussions throughout the market.

The example is that American who fail leaving many lending institutions and not adequately monitoring the financial market has created a system that its failure has created a crisis that has spread worldwide.